<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Farm Bill Facts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.farmbillfacts.org/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.farmbillfacts.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 13:53:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>What to Expect When You are Expecting a Farm Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.farmbillfacts.org/what-to-expect-when-you-are-e?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=what-to-expect-when-you-are-e</link>
		<comments>http://www.farmbillfacts.org/what-to-expect-when-you-are-e#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 13:53:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>American Farmland Trust</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservation compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crop insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[farm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[farm bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ranch land]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regional food systems]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.farmbillfacts.org/?p=1422</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The process to reauthorize the Farm Bill is never easy, but this time around it has been more challenging than ever. The anticipation of the next five-year Farm Bill has been met with federal budget pressures and Congressional stalemate. The good news is that Congress is making progress to pass this long-overdue bill, with the [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The process to reauthorize the Farm Bill is never easy, but this time around it has been more challenging than ever. The anticipation of the next five-year Farm Bill has been met with federal budget pressures and Congressional stalemate.<span id="more-1422"></span></p>
<p>The good news is that Congress is making progress to pass this long-overdue bill, with the Senate passing a bill last week and a version now making its way through House. But what is in store for the Farm Bill in the coming months? How might this rocky start impact the final bill?</p>
<p>Watch the webinar, <i><a href="http://www.farmbillfacts.org/what-to-expect-when-you-are-expecting-a-farm-bill">What to Expect When You are Expecting a Farm Bill</a></i> to learn more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.farmbillfacts.org/what-to-expect-when-you-are-e/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Farm Policy Roundup &#8211; June 14, 2013</title>
		<link>http://www.farmbillfacts.org/farm-policy-roundup-6-14-2013?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=farm-policy-roundup-6-14-2013</link>
		<comments>http://www.farmbillfacts.org/farm-policy-roundup-6-14-2013#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2013 21:42:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Peters</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Farm Bill 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House Rules Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs Act 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.farmbillfacts.org/?p=1406</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Senate Passes Farm Bill This week, the United States Senate passed the Agriculture Reform, Food and Jobs Act of 2013. The bipartisan vote was 66-27, with 18 Republicans joining the Democrats in the majority.  American Farmland Trust praised the Senate for passing the bill which includes reattaching conservation compliance with crop insurance premium assistance. House [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Senate</b><a href="http://www.farmbillfacts.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/roundup.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1253" style="border: 2px solid white; margin-left: 2px; margin-right: 2px;" alt="Rancher with lasso" src="http://www.farmbillfacts.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/roundup.jpg" width="100" height="96" /></a><b> Passes Farm Bill</b></p>
<p>This week, the United States Senate passed the Agriculture Reform, Food and Jobs Act of 2013. The <a href="http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=113&amp;session=1&amp;vote=00145">bipartisan vote was 66-27</a>, with 18 Republicans joining the Democrats in the majority.  American Farmland Trust praised the Senate for passing the bill which includes reattaching conservation compliance with crop insurance premium assistance.<span id="more-1406"></span></p>
<p><b>House Farm Bill Consideration</b></p>
<p>Attention now focuses on the House of Representatives, which will begin floor consideration of the Federal Agriculture Reform and Risk Management Act of 2013 next week. American Farmland Trust joined with a group of over <a href="http://www.farmbillfacts.org/house-farm-bill-coalition-letter">190 organizations</a> calling for the House to pass a comprehensive 5-year farm bill.</p>
<p>Speaker of the House <a href="http://www.speaker.gov/">John Boehner</a>, R-Ohio, made news by announcing he would vote for the farm bill to be able to “make sure the good work of the Agriculture Committee gets to a conference.” House Majority Leader <a href="http://majorityleader.gov/">Eric Cantor</a>, R-Va., said today he “looks forward to a full debate on the floor.” The Majority Leader has included the farm bill on the <a href="http://majorityleader.gov/floor/weekly.html">legislative calendar</a> for next week, with floor consideration beginning on Tuesday, June 18.</p>
<p>Exactly how the bill will be considered on House floor for debate and the number of amendments that might be considered is still unknown. The <a href="http://rules.house.gov/bill/hr-1947">House Rules Committee</a> is expected to meet early next week to determine how the House will proceed with debate on the bill. The committee has set a 2PM amendment deadline for Monday, June 17.</p>
<p><b>You Can Help!</b></p>
<p>American Farmland Trust continues to work to ensure the <a href="http://www.farmland.org/news/pressreleases/2013/AFT-Supports-Thompson-Fortenberry-Bill.asp">Thompson-Fortenberry</a> conservation compliance amendment is successful on the House floor. We are walking the halls of Congress to get support for the bill, but we need your help! Visit the <a href="https://secure2.convio.net/aft/site/Advocacy?pagename=homepage&amp;page=UserAction&amp;id=417&amp;AddInterest=1061&amp;JServSessionIdr004=1luf5d8x52.app244a">American Farmland Trust Action Center</a> today to contact your representative.</p>
<p><b>Free Farm Bill Webinar</b></p>
<p>And if you need more information on the latest farm bill activity, be sure to register for our <a href="http://action.farmland.org/site/R?i=0Hw1nMKZ3s1HobynQcstiw">free webinar</a> <i>What to Expect When You are Expecting a Farm Bill</i> to be held this Monday, June 17 at 1 PM ET.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.farmbillfacts.org/farm-policy-roundup-6-14-2013/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>House Farm Bill Coalition Letter</title>
		<link>http://www.farmbillfacts.org/house-farm-bill-coalition-letter?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=house-farm-bill-coalition-letter</link>
		<comments>http://www.farmbillfacts.org/house-farm-bill-coalition-letter#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2013 21:25:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>American Farmland Trust</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2013 Farm Bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coalition Letter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FARRM 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House Committee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.farmbillfacts.org/?p=1400</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#160; June 11, 2013 {Sent to each member of the House individually} Dear: The undersigned organizations applaud the House Committee on Agriculture for expeditiously moving forward on a five year farm bill. The Federal Agriculture Reform and Risk Management (FARRM) Act of 2013 (H.R. 1947) achieves spending cuts that reduce the Federal budget deficit, saving [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>June 11, 2013</p>
<p>{Sent to each member of the House individually}</p>
<p>Dear:</p>
<p>The undersigned organizations applaud the House Committee on Agriculture for expeditiously moving forward on a five year farm bill.</p>
<p>The <i>Federal Agriculture Reform and Risk Management (FARRM) Act of 2013 </i>(H.R. 1947) achieves spending cuts that reduce the Federal budget deficit, saving taxpayers $40 billion, including $6 billion through sequestration. It also repeals or consolidates more than 100 programs administered by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, including Direct Payments to crop producers. Without passage of FARRM, no budget savings will be achieved beyond sequestration.<span id="more-1400"></span></p>
<p>The farm bill promotes an economically healthy U.S. agriculture sector. Its policies serve a variety of purposes including: meeting the food, fuel and fiber needs of consumers worldwide; providing a farm and natural resource safety net; improving our balance of trade through trade promotion programs; promoting rural development; and creating needed jobs here at home.</p>
<p>We stand united in our strong support for a new five-year bill and commend the House Committee on Agriculture for advancing a bill for timely action by the full House. Failure to pass a five-year farm bill before the end of September would mean continued uncertainty for farmers, ranchers and their rural communities; it would also mean that American taxpayer would see none of the budget savings achieved.</p>
<p>We look forward to working with you towards our common goal of passing a five year farm bill.</p>
<p>Sincerely,</p>
<p>AgCountry Farm Credit Services</p>
<p>AgFirst Farm Credit Bank</p>
<p>AgPreference</p>
<p>Ag Processing, Inc.</p>
<p>AgriBank</p>
<p>Agribusiness Council of Indiana</p>
<p>Agricultural Council of California</p>
<p>AgStar Financial Services</p>
<p>AgTEXAS Farm Credit</p>
<p>Alabama Farmers’ Cooperative, Inc.</p>
<p>Amcot</p>
<p>American AgCredit</p>
<p>American Association of Crop Insurers</p>
<p>American Bankers Association</p>
<p>American Beekeeping Federation</p>
<p>American Crystal Sugar Company</p>
<p>American Farm Bureau Federation</p>
<p>American Farmland Trust</p>
<p>American Feed Industry Association</p>
<p>American Frozen Food Institute</p>
<p>American Fruit and Vegetable Processors and Growers Coalition</p>
<p>American Meat Institute</p>
<p>American Seed Trade Association</p>
<p>American Sheep Industry Association</p>
<p>American Society of Farm Managers and Rural Appraisers</p>
<p>American Soybean Association</p>
<p>American Sugar Alliance</p>
<p>American Sugar Cane League</p>
<p>American Sugarbeet Growers Association</p>
<p>American Veterinary Medical Association</p>
<p>Apricot Producers of California</p>
<p>Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies</p>
<p>Badgerland Financial, ACA</p>
<p>Biotechnology Industry Organization</p>
<p>Blue Diamond Growers</p>
<p>Calcot Ltd.</p>
<p>California Association of Winegrape Growers</p>
<p>California Canning Peach Association</p>
<p>California Date Commission</p>
<p>California Fig Advisory Board</p>
<p>California Strawberry Commission</p>
<p>California Walnut Commission</p>
<p>Canned Food Alliance</p>
<p>Carolinas Cotton Growers Cooperative</p>
<p>Ceres Solutions LLP</p>
<p>CHS Inc.</p>
<p>Co-Alliance LLP</p>
<p>CoBank</p>
<p>Cooperative Network</p>
<p>Colorado Corn Growers Association</p>
<p>Colorado Sorghum Producers</p>
<p>Corn Producers Association of Texas</p>
<p>Cotton Growers Warehouse Association</p>
<p>Cotton Warehouse Association of America</p>
<p>CountryMark</p>
<p>Crop Insurance and Reinsurance Bureau</p>
<p>Crop Insurance Professionals Association</p>
<p>CropLife America</p>
<p>Dairy Farmers of America</p>
<p>Dairy Producers of New Mexico</p>
<p>Dairy Producers of Utah</p>
<p>Dairylea Cooperative Inc.</p>
<p>Ducks Unlimited</p>
<p>Equity Cooperative Livestock Sales Association</p>
<p>Farm Credit Bank of Texas</p>
<p>Farm Credit Council</p>
<p>Farm Credit East</p>
<p>Farm Credit of East Central Oklahoma</p>
<p>Farm Credit of Maine</p>
<p>Farm Credit of Ness City</p>
<p>Farm Credit of New Mexico</p>
<p>Farm Credit of Southern Colorado</p>
<p>Farm Credit West</p>
<p>Farm Credit Western Arkansas</p>
<p>Farm Credit Services of America</p>
<p>Farm Credit Services of Illinois</p>
<p>Farmer Mac</p>
<p>FCS Financial</p>
<p>Florida Crystals Corporation</p>
<p>Florida Sugar Cane League</p>
<p>Fruit Growers Supply Company</p>
<p>GreenStone Farm Credit Services</p>
<p>GROWMARK, Inc.</p>
<p>Hawaii Sugar Farmers</p>
<p>Idaho Dairymen’s Association</p>
<p>Independent Community Bankers of America</p>
<p>Independent Insurance Agents &amp; Brokers of America</p>
<p>Irrigation Association</p>
<p>Kansas Agribusiness Retailers Association</p>
<p>Kansas Cooperative Council</p>
<p>Kansas Grain &amp; Feed Association</p>
<p>Land Improvement Contractors of America</p>
<p>Land O&#8217; Lakes, Inc.</p>
<p>Maryland &amp; Virginia Milk Producers Cooperative Association, Inc.</p>
<p>MBG Marketing</p>
<p>Michigan Agri-Business Council</p>
<p>Michigan Bean Shippers</p>
<p>Michigan Milk Producers Association</p>
<p>Michigan Processing Apple Growers</p>
<p>Milk Producers Council of California</p>
<p>National Association of Conservation Districts</p>
<p>National Association of RC&amp;D Councils</p>
<p>National Association of State Conservation Agencies</p>
<p>National Association of State Departments of Agriculture</p>
<p>National Association of Wheat Growers</p>
<p>National Barley Growers Association</p>
<p>National Cattlemen’s Beef Association</p>
<p>National Chicken Council</p>
<p>National Coalition for Food and Agricultural Research</p>
<p>National Conservation District Employees Association</p>
<p>National Corn Growers Association</p>
<p>National Cotton Council</p>
<p>National Council of Farmer Cooperatives</p>
<p>National Farmers Union</p>
<p>National Grape Cooperative Association Inc.</p>
<p>National Milk Producers Federation</p>
<p>National Pork Producers Council</p>
<p>National Renderers Association</p>
<p>National Rural Electric Cooperative Association</p>
<p>National Sorghum Producers</p>
<p>National Sunflower Association</p>
<p>National Turkey Federation</p>
<p>National Wild Turkey Federation</p>
<p>Nebraska Cooperative Council</p>
<p>Nebraska Grain Sorghum Board</p>
<p>Nebraska Grain Sorghum Producers Association</p>
<p>New Mexico Sorghum Association</p>
<p>New Mexico Peanut Growers Association</p>
<p>North American Blueberry Council</p>
<p>Northeast States Association for Agricultural Stewardship</p>
<p>Northwest Dairy Association/Darigold, Inc.</p>
<p>Northwest Farm Credit Services</p>
<p>NORPAC Foods, Inc.</p>
<p>Ocean Spray Cranberries, Inc.</p>
<p>Oklahoma Agribusiness Retailers Association</p>
<p>Oklahoma Agricultural Cooperative Council</p>
<p>Oklahoma Grain &amp; Feed Association</p>
<p>Oklahoma Peanut Commission</p>
<p>Oklahoma Seed Trade Association</p>
<p>Oklahoma Sorghum Association</p>
<p>Oklahoma Wheat Growers Association</p>
<p>Olive Growers Council of California</p>
<p>Oregon Association of Nurseries</p>
<p>Pacific Coast Producers</p>
<p>Panhandle Peanut Growers Association</p>
<p>Partners for Sustainable Pollination</p>
<p>Pheasants Forever</p>
<p>Plains Cotton Cooperative Association</p>
<p>Pollinator Partnership</p>
<p>Public Lands Council</p>
<p>Quail Forever</p>
<p>Riceland Foods, Inc.</p>
<p>Rio Grande Valley Sugar Growers</p>
<p>Select Milk Producers, Inc.</p>
<p>South Dakota Association of Cooperatives</p>
<p>South Dakota Wheat Growers</p>
<p>South East Dairy Farmers Association</p>
<p>Southern Cotton Growers</p>
<p>Southern Peanut Farmers Federation</p>
<p>Southern States Cooperative, Inc.</p>
<p>Southwest Council of Agribusiness</p>
<p>Specialty Crop Farm Bill Alliance</p>
<p>Staplcotn</p>
<p>State Agriculture and Rural Leaders</p>
<p>Sugar Cane Growers Cooperative of Florida</p>
<p>Sunkist Growers, Inc.</p>
<p>Sun-Maid Growers of California</p>
<p>Sunsweet Growers, Inc.</p>
<p>Tennessee Farmers Cooperative</p>
<p>Texas Agricultural Cooperative Council</p>
<p>Texas Cattle Feeders Association</p>
<p>Texas Grain Sorghum Association</p>
<p>Texas Wheat Producers Association</p>
<p>The Fertilizer Institute</p>
<p>The Nature Conservancy</p>
<p>United Dairymen of Arizona</p>
<p>United FCS</p>
<p>United Producers, Inc.</p>
<p>US Canola Association</p>
<p>US Cattlemen’s Association</p>
<p>US Dry Bean Council</p>
<p>US Rice Producers Association</p>
<p>U.S. Beet Sugar Association</p>
<p>U.S. Sugar Corporation</p>
<p>USA Dry Pea &amp; Lentil Council</p>
<p>USA Rice Federation</p>
<p>Valley Fig Growers</p>
<p>Washington State Council of Farmer Cooperatives</p>
<p>Washington State Dairy Federation</p>
<p>Welch Foods Inc., A Cooperative</p>
<p>West Central Cooperative</p>
<p>Western AgCredit</p>
<p>Western Peanut Growers Association</p>
<p>Yankee Farm Credit</p>
<p>Yosemite Farm Credit</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.farmbillfacts.org/house-farm-bill-coalition-letter/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Farm Policy Roundup &#8211; June 7, 2013</title>
		<link>http://www.farmbillfacts.org/farm-policy-roundup-6-7-2013?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=farm-policy-roundup-6-7-2013</link>
		<comments>http://www.farmbillfacts.org/farm-policy-roundup-6-7-2013#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 20:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Peters</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[budget appropriations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservation compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[farm bill]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.farmbillfacts.org/?p=1383</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Final Senate Farm Bill Vote on Monday The 2013 Farm Bill cleared yet another major hurdle on Thursday with the U.S. Senate voting 75-22 to invoke cloture, a procedure that limits debate and firmly establishes a timeline for a final vote. Immediately after the vote, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid announced that on Monday, June [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b><a href="http://www.farmbillfacts.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/roundup.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1253" style="border: 2px solid white; margin-left: 2px; margin-right: 2px;" alt="Rancher with lasso" src="http://www.farmbillfacts.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/roundup.jpg" width="100" height="96" /></a>Final Senate Farm Bill Vote on Monday</b></p>
<p>The 2013 Farm Bill cleared yet another major hurdle on Thursday with the U.S. Senate <a href="http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=113&amp;session=1&amp;vote=00141">voting 75-22</a> to invoke cloture, a procedure that limits debate and firmly establishes a timeline for a final vote.</p>
<p>Immediately after the vote, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid announced that on Monday, June 10 one <a href="http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d113:SP00998:">amendment #998</a> by Senator Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., to establish a gigabit internet pilot program in rural areas, would be considered before a vote on final passage. American Farmland Trust and over <a href="http://farmpolicy.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/Cloture-Coal-Ltr13.0605.pdf">120 other agriculture, conservation and nutrition groups</a> led a push to urge the Senate to approve the cloture vote.<br />
<span id="more-1383"></span><br />
<a title="Conservation Compliance Annual Soil Graphic" href="http://www.farmbillfacts.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/AFT_Soil_3.pdf" target="_blank"><img class="size-full wp-image-1386 alignright" style="border: 2px solid white; margin-left: 2px; margin-right: 2px;" alt="AFT_Soil_3_web.image_400px" src="http://www.farmbillfacts.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/AFT_Soil_3_web.image_400px1.jpg" width="400" height="304" /></a><b>Conservation Compliance Amendment in House</b></p>
<p>Final passage of the farm bill in the Senate will shift attention to the House of Representatives, where floor consideration is expected to begin the week of June 17. In preparation for the House floor debate, Representatives Mike Thompson, D-Calif., and Jeff Fortenberry, R-Neb., this week introduced H.R. 2260, <a href="http://mikethompson.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=336873">The Crop Insurance Accountability Act of 2013</a>. Virtually identical to a measure included in the Senate farm bill, H.R. 2260 would re-link conservation compliance requirements with crop insurance premium assistance. <a href="http://www.farmland.org/news/pressreleases/2013/AFT-Supports-Thompson-Fortenberry-Bill.asp">American Farmland Trust praised the bill</a>, calling it both good for farmers and good for the environment.</p>
<p><b>We need your help.</b> Visit the <a href="https://secure2.convio.net/aft/site/Advocacy?pagename=homepage&amp;page=UserAction&amp;id=417&amp;AddInterest=1061&amp;JServSessionIdr004=x2izjbr4r2.app246a">American Farmland Trust Action Center</a> today and urge your representative to support the Thompson/Fortenberry bill!</p>
<p>Over the <a href="http://www.farmbillfacts.org/report-reveals-success-of-conservation-compliance-in-protecting-soils-and-wetlands">25-year history of conservation compliance</a>, 295 million tons of soil have been saved per year—billions of tons of soil that has been held in place and kept from entering our rivers, lakes and streams. (For those in Washington, D.C., that’s enough to cover the entire area of the National Mall with 1,100 feet of soil every year!) Further, an estimated 1.5 million to 3.3 million acres of vulnerable wetlands have not been drained as a result of conservation compliance. Support of the Thompson/Fortenberry bill will ensure these important farmland conservation benefits continue into the future.</p>
<p><b>Free Farm Bill Webinar June 17</b></p>
<p>Ahead of House floor consideration of the farm bill, American Farmland Trust will be hosting a free webinar on June 17 from 1-2 PM titled, <a href="http://action.farmland.org/site/R?i=0Hw1nMKZ3s1HobynQcstiw"><i>What To Expect When You Are Expecting A Farm Bill</i></a><i>,</i> to provide an update on where things stand, major provisions of both the House and Senate versions of the bill, and our priorities going forward. In case you haven’t been following farm bill activity over the last few weeks, the <a href="http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R43076.pdf">Congressional Research Service</a> has been busy preparing a report reviewing the House and Senate versions of the farm bill and comparing them to current law.</p>
<p><b>House Agriculture Appropriations Update</b></p>
<p>On the spending side, the <a href="http://appropriations.house.gov/subcommittees/subcommittee/?IssueID=43419">House Agriculture Appropriations</a> subcommittee this week marked up legislation to provide fiscal year 2014 (FY14) funding for USDA programs. Under the subcommittee draft, the NRCS Conservation Operations account would receive $810 million in FY14, an increase of over $40 million what the agency received for fiscal year 2013. However the subcommittee also cut over $500 million from mandatory farm bill conservation programs. Specific farm bill conservation program funding levels and related cuts in the draft include $150 million (-$50 million) for the Farm and Ranchland Protection Program (FRPP), $1.35 billion (-$400 million) for the Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP), $45 million (-$40 million) for the Wildlife Habitat Incentives Program (WHIP) and $2.5 million (-$12.5 million) for the Agricultural Management Assistance (AMA) program. American Farmland Trust and a <a href="http://www.farmbillfacts.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/FY14-House-Ag-Approps-conservation-letter_June4.pdf">coalition of conservation groups</a> earlier this week urged the subcommittee to reject cuts to conservation programs.</p>
<p><b>Major USDA Climate Announcement</b></p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.usda.gov/2013/06/07/secretarys-column-creating-modern-solutions-to-environmental-challenges/">USDA Secretary Tom Vilsack</a> gave a speech this week outlining significant steps the administration is taking to increase collaboration with farmers, ranchers, researchers and industry to develop the next generation of solutions to help agriculture mitigate and adapt to climate challenges. American Farmland Trust attended the Secretary’s speech at the National Press Club where he highlighted several new measures that USDA will take to help farmers create new climate solutions including:</p>
<ul>
<li>The formation of new <a href="http://www.usda.gov/oce/climate_change/regional_hubs.htm">Regional Climate Hubs</a> to serve as a source of regional data and information for hazard and adaptation planning in the agriculture and forest sectors;</li>
<li>A new NRCS &#8220;Carbon Management and Evaluation Tool,&#8221; also known as <a href="http://www.comet-farm.com/">COMET-FARM</a>, which is a free online tool that will help farmers calculate how conservation actions and land management decisions impact energy use and carbon emissions and carbon sequestration;</li>
<li>An online release of data collected under the <a href="http://soils.usda.gov/survey/raca/index.html">Rapid Carbon Assessment</a>, which began in 2010 to develop statistically reliable quantitative estimates of amounts and distribution of carbon stocks for U.S. soils;</li>
<li>Uniform, science-based <a href="http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/climatechange/?cid=stelprdb1077238">Cover Crop Guidelines</a> developed by stakeholders, partner universities, and the crop insurance industry to figure out how to make cover crop guidelines straightforward and sensible using a new model based on local climate data, tillage management and soil information to account for daily crop growth and use of soil moisture.</li>
</ul>
<p>The full transcript of Secretary Vilsack’s speech is available <a href="http://www.usda.gov/wps/portal/usda/usdamediafb?contentid=2013/06/0113.xml&amp;printable=true&amp;contentidonly=true">online</a>.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.farmbillfacts.org/farm-policy-roundup-6-7-2013/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>American Farmland Trust Supports Thompson-Fortenberry Conservation Compliance Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.farmbillfacts.org/american-farmland-trust-supports-thompson-fortenberry-conservation-compliance-bill?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=american-farmland-trust-supports-thompson-fortenberry-conservation-compliance-bill</link>
		<comments>http://www.farmbillfacts.org/american-farmland-trust-supports-thompson-fortenberry-conservation-compliance-bill#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 13:31:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>American Farmland Trust</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Items]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservation compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[farm bill]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.farmbillfacts.org/?p=1378</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[PRESS RELEASE WASHINGTON, D.C., June 5, 2013 –American Farmland Trust (AFT) President Jon Scholl praised the introduction of H.R. 2260, The Crop Insurance Accountability Act of 2013, by Congressman Mike Thompson (D-Calif.) and Congressman Jeff Fortenberry (R-Neb.). &#8220;AFT is pleased that Congressmen Thompson and Fortenberry are leading the effort to re-link conservation compliance with crop insurance premium [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PRESS RELEASE</p>
<p><a href="http://www.farmbillfacts.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/tractor-in-corn-field-small.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-960 alignright" style="border: 2px solid white; margin-left: 2px; margin-right: 2px;" alt="Tractor in a corn field" src="http://www.farmbillfacts.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/tractor-in-corn-field-small.jpg" width="175" height="116" /></a>WASHINGTON, D.C., June 5, 2013 –<a href="http://www.farmland.org/">American Farmland Trust</a> (AFT) President Jon Scholl praised the introduction of H.R. 2260, <i>The Crop Insurance Accountability Act of 2013</i>, by Congressman Mike Thompson (D-Calif.) and Congressman Jeff Fortenberry (R-Neb.).</p>
<p>&#8220;AFT is pleased that Congressmen Thompson and Fortenberry are leading the effort to re-link conservation compliance with crop insurance premium assistance. Conservation compliance is a common-sense, reasonable policy that is good for the environment and good for farmers,&#8221; said Scholl.<br />
<span id="more-1378"></span><br />
The Senate version of the farm bill includes language that re-links conservation compliance with crop insurance premium assistance. Scholl said re-linking conservation compliance to crop insurance protects against soil erosion, preserves important wetlands and protects taxpayers’ investments in sound agricultural and conservation policy. Conservation compliance was de-coupled from crop insurance in 1996 and linked to the newly created direct payment program implemented that year.</p>
<p>“As the House of Representatives begins their work on the farm bill in the coming weeks, we look forward to working with them on this measure,” Scholl added.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">###</p>
<p><b>About American Farmland Trust</b></p>
<p>American Farmland Trust is the nation’s leading conservation organization dedicated to protecting farmland, promoting sound farming practices and keeping farmers on the land. Since its founding in 1980 by a group of farmers and citizens concerned about the rapid loss of farmland to development, AFT has helped save millions of acres of farmland from development and led the way for the adoption of conservation practices on millions more.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>AFT’s national office is located in Washington, DC. Phone: 202-331-7300. For more information, visit <a href="http://www.farmland.org/">www.farmland.org</a>.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.farmbillfacts.org/american-farmland-trust-supports-thompson-fortenberry-conservation-compliance-bill/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Farm Policy Roundup &#8211; May 31, 2013</title>
		<link>http://www.farmbillfacts.org/farm-policy-roundup-5-31-201?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=farm-policy-roundup-5-31-201</link>
		<comments>http://www.farmbillfacts.org/farm-policy-roundup-5-31-201#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 May 2013 20:45:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Peters</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Agriculture Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservation Stewardship Program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[farm bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food and Jobs Act]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.farmbillfacts.org/?p=1374</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Senate floor consideration of S. 954, the Agriculture Reform, Food and Jobs Act of 2013 will resume on Monday, June 3 when the Senate returns to session.  Continued support for the conservation compliance agreement is needed in the Senate to keep provisions intact to protect fragile soils and vulnerable wetlands while also providing an effective [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.farmbillfacts.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/roundup.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-1253 alignleft" style="border: 2px solid white; margin-left: 2px; margin-right: 2px;" alt="Rancher with lasso" src="http://www.farmbillfacts.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/roundup.jpg" width="100" height="96" /></a>Senate floor consideration of S. 954, the Agriculture Reform, Food and Jobs Act of 2013 will resume on Monday, June 3 when the Senate returns to session.  Continued <a href="https://secure2.convio.net/aft/site/Advocacy?pagename=homepage&amp;page=UserAction&amp;id=413&amp;autologin=true&amp;AddInterest=1061&amp;JServSessionIdr004=styh3oc5j2.app244a">support for the conservation compliance agreement is needed in the Senate</a> to keep provisions intact to protect fragile soils and vulnerable wetlands while also providing an effective farm and natural resource safety net.</p>
<p>Amendments that AFT is supporting include <a href="http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d113:SP01093:">amendment #1093</a> by Senators Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., William Cowan, D-Mass., and Susan Collins, R-Maine, which would provide payment limit equity between organic and conventional producers in the Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP), <a href="http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d113:SP01049:">amendment #1049</a> by Senators Tom Udall, D-N.M., and Martin Heinrich, D-N.M., which would revise EQIP provisions to improve water conservation and irrigation efficiency, <a href="http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d113:SP0986:">amendment #986</a> by Senators Bob Casey, D-Pa., and Tom Harkin, D-Iowa, which would help beginning farmers and ranchers better access capital through microloans, and <a href="http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d113:SP01055:">amendment #1055</a> by Senators Tom Udall, D-N.M., and Martin Heinrich, D-N.M., which would increase funding for the  Socially Disadvantaged Farmers and Ranchers and Veteran Farmers and Ranchers Program.<span id="more-1374"></span></p>
<p>Stay tuned for other amendments that may come forward as the Senate continues floor consideration.</p>
<p>Leadership in the House of Representatives has indicated floor consideration of the Federal Agriculture Reform and Risk Management Act of 2013 will begin on June 17. AFT and the coalition of agriculture and conservation groups are actively pursuing introduction of a conservation compliance bill to be introduced in the House in early June.</p>
<p>This week, USDA announced that several conservation programs will have enrollment in 2013, including the <a href="http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/newsroom/releases/?cid=STELPRDB1117404">Conservation Stewardship Program</a>, the <a href="http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/newsroom/releases/?cid=STELPRDB1117557">Wetlands Reserve Program and the Grassland Reserve Program</a>. The availability of funding for these programs was uncertain with impact of the sequestration and expiration of some farm bill program leaving specific funding amounts in question.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.farmbillfacts.org/farm-policy-roundup-5-31-201/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Farm Policy Roundup &#8211; May 24, 2013</title>
		<link>http://www.farmbillfacts.org/farm-policy-roundup-5-24-2013?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=farm-policy-roundup-5-24-2013</link>
		<comments>http://www.farmbillfacts.org/farm-policy-roundup-5-24-2013#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 16:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Peters</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservation compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[farm bill]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.farmbillfacts.org/?p=1366</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Senate floor consideration of S. 954, the Agriculture Reform, Food and Jobs Act of 2013 began this week, with a handful of amendments receiving votes. The Senate adjourned for Memorial Day recess yesterday, with farm bill consideration scheduled to resume on Monday, June 3 when the Senate returns to session. As of May 23, the [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.farmbillfacts.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/roundup.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1253" style="border: 2px solid white; margin-left: 2px; margin-right: 2px;" alt="Rancher with lasso" src="http://www.farmbillfacts.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/roundup.jpg" width="100" height="96" /></a>Senate floor consideration of S. 954, the Agriculture Reform, Food and Jobs Act of 2013 began this week, with a handful of amendments receiving votes. The Senate adjourned for Memorial Day recess yesterday, with farm bill consideration scheduled to resume on Monday, June 3 when the Senate returns to session.</p>
<p>As of May 23, the Senate had voted on nine amendments. Of particular interest to AFT was the vote on the amendment by Senator Dick Durbin, D-Ill., and Senator Tom Coburn, R-Okla., which applies a limit for crop insurance premium assistance for persons or entities with adjusted gross income greater than $750,000. AFT opposed the Durbin-Coburn amendment in support of the conservation compliance agreement reached by agriculture and conservation groups.<br />
<span id="more-1366"></span><br />
Chairwoman Debbie Stabenow, D-Mich., spoke on the floor about the <a href="http://farmpolicy.com/2013/05/22/chairwoman-stabenow-explains-policy-link-between-conservation-crop-insurance/">conservation compliance agreement</a>, the impact it will have in conserving natural resources on the landscape while producing a stronger farm safety net, and the need for keeping the agreement in place through a farm bill conference committee.</p>
<p>The full list of amendments considered by the Senate this week and the resulting vote are listed below:</p>
<table style="width: 100%;" border="2" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="58"><b>Vote</b></td>
<td width="68"><b>Date</b></td>
<td width="60"><b>Issue</b></td>
<td width="171"><b>Question</b></td>
<td width="111"><b>Result</b></td>
<td width="308"><b>Description</b></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="58"><a href="http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=113&amp;session=1&amp;vote=00139">00139</a></td>
<td valign="top" width="68">23-May</td>
<td valign="top" width="60"><a href="http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d113:SN00954:">S. 954</a></td>
<td valign="top" width="171">On the Amendment <a href="http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d113:SP00953:">S.Amdt. 953</a></td>
<td valign="top" width="111">Agreed to</td>
<td valign="top" width="308">Durbin Amdt. No. 953; To limit the amount of premium subsidy provided by the Federal Crop Insurance Corporation on behalf of any person or legal entity with an average adjusted gross income in excess of $750,000, with a delayed application of the limitation until completion of a study on the effects of the limitation.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="58"><a href="http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=113&amp;session=1&amp;vote=00138">00138</a></td>
<td valign="top" width="68">23-May</td>
<td valign="top" width="60"><a href="http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d113:SN00954:">S. 954</a></td>
<td valign="top" width="171">On the Amendment <a href="http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d113:SP01031:">S.Amdt. 1031</a></td>
<td valign="top" width="111">Agreed to</td>
<td valign="top" width="308">Hagan Amdt. No. 1031; To authorize the use of the insurance fund to reduce fraud and maintain program integrity in the crop insurance program.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="58"><a href="http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=113&amp;session=1&amp;vote=00137">00137</a></td>
<td valign="top" width="68">23-May</td>
<td valign="top" width="60"><a href="http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d113:SN00954:">S. 954</a></td>
<td valign="top" width="171">On the Amendment <a href="http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d113:SP00923:">S.Amdt. 923</a></td>
<td valign="top" width="111">Rejected</td>
<td valign="top" width="308">Feinstein Amdt. No. 923; To prohibit the payment by the Federal Crop Insurance Corporation of any portion of the premium for a policy or plan of insurance for tobacco.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="58"><a href="http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=113&amp;session=1&amp;vote=00135">00135</a></td>
<td valign="top" width="68">23-May</td>
<td valign="top" width="60"><a href="http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d113:SN00954:">S. 954</a></td>
<td valign="top" width="171">On the Amendment <a href="http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d113:SP00965:">S.Amdt. 965</a></td>
<td valign="top" width="111">Rejected</td>
<td valign="top" width="308">Sanders Amdt. No. 965; To permit States to require that any food, beverage, or other edible product offered for sale have a label on indicating that the food, beverage, or other edible product contains a genetically engineered ingredient.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="58"><a href="http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=113&amp;session=1&amp;vote=00134">00134</a></td>
<td valign="top" width="68">22-May</td>
<td valign="top" width="60"><a href="http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d113:SN00954:">S. 954</a></td>
<td valign="top" width="171">On the Amendment <a href="http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d113:SP00925:">S.Amdt. 925</a></td>
<td valign="top" width="111">Rejected</td>
<td valign="top" width="308">Shaheen Amdt. No. 925; To reform the Federal sugar program, and for other purposes.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="58"><a href="http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=113&amp;session=1&amp;vote=00132">00132</a></td>
<td valign="top" width="68">22-May</td>
<td valign="top" width="60"><a href="http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d113:SN00954:">S. 954</a></td>
<td valign="top" width="171">On the Amendment <a href="http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d113:SP00960:">S.Amdt. 960</a></td>
<td valign="top" width="111">Rejected</td>
<td valign="top" width="308">Inhofe Amdt. No. 960; To repeal the nutrition entitlement programs and establish a nutrition assistance block grant program.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="58"><a href="http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=113&amp;session=1&amp;vote=00131">00131</a></td>
<td valign="top" width="68">21-May</td>
<td valign="top" width="60"><a href="http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d113:SN00954:">S. 954</a></td>
<td valign="top" width="171">On the Amendment <a href="http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d113:SP00931:">S.Amdt. 931</a></td>
<td valign="top" width="111">Rejected</td>
<td valign="top" width="308">Gillibrand Amdt. No. 931; To strike a reduction in the supplemental nutrition assistance program, with an offset that limits crop insurance reimbursements to providers.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="58"><a href="http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=113&amp;session=1&amp;vote=00130">00130</a></td>
<td valign="top" width="68">21-May</td>
<td valign="top" width="60"><a href="http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d113:SN00954:">S. 954</a></td>
<td valign="top" width="171">On the Amendment <a href="http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d113:SP00948:">S.Amdt. 948</a></td>
<td valign="top" width="111">Rejected</td>
<td valign="top" width="308">Roberts Amdt. No. 948; To improve and extend certain nutrition programs.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="58"><a href="http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=113&amp;session=1&amp;vote=00129">00129</a></td>
<td valign="top" width="68">21-May</td>
<td valign="top" width="60"><a href="http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d113:SN00954:">S. 954</a></td>
<td valign="top" width="171">On the Amendment <a href="http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d113:SP00919:">S.Amdt. 919</a></td>
<td valign="top" width="111">Agreed to</td>
<td valign="top" width="308">Cantwell Amdt. No. 919; To allow Indian tribes to participate in certain soil and water conservation programs.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>The Senate bill still contains strong overall funding for the combined Agricultural Conservation Easement Program, with $2.2 billion over five years while the House bill contains about $2.05 billion.  AFT has been working with the Senate and House agriculture committees to include favorable report language for the program, particularly in the area of certification for state and local farmland protection programs.</p>
<p>The Regional Conservation Partnership Program (RCPP) also contains robust funding of $500 million over 5 years in both the Senate and House bills.</p>
<p>Nearly 200 amendments have been filed and more could be filed before the Senate completes consideration of the farm bill, although many are anticipated to be on issues non-germane to the bill.</p>
<p>Amendments that AFT is supporting includes <a href="http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d113:SP01093:">amendment #1093</a> by Senators Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., William Cowan, D-Mass., and Susan Collins, R-Maine, which would provide payment limit equity between organic and conventional producers in the Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP). We also support <a href="http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d113:SP01049:">amendment #1049</a> by Senators Mark Udall, D-N.M., and Martin Heinrich, D-N.M., which would revise EQIP provisions to improve water conservation and irrigation efficiency.</p>
<p>The White House issued a <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/legislative/sap/113/saps954s_20130520.pdf">Statement of Administration Position</a> which articulates the administration’s support for the Senate&#8217;s “efforts to consolidate and streamline conservation assistance, which will reduce administrative burdens on farmers and ranchers and improve environmental outcomes,” and belief that “crop insurance payments should be tied to the Nation&#8217;s soil conservation and wetland protection goals.”</p>
<p>The House of Representatives is likely to begin floor consideration of the Federal Agriculture Reform and Risk Management Act of 2013 in mid-June. AFT and the coalition of agriculture and conservation groups are actively pursuing introduction of a conservation compliance bill to be introduced in the House in early June.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.farmbillfacts.org/farm-policy-roundup-5-24-2013/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Farm Policy Roundup &#8211; May 17, 2013</title>
		<link>http://www.farmbillfacts.org/farm-policy-roundup-05-17-2013?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=farm-policy-roundup-05-17-2013</link>
		<comments>http://www.farmbillfacts.org/farm-policy-roundup-05-17-2013#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 21:58:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Peters</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[farm bill]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.farmbillfacts.org/?p=1360</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[House and Senate Agriculture Committees completed work this week on their respective versions of the 2013 Farm Bill. Highlights of both markups are below. Major differences exist between the bills, primarily on nutrition and commodity programs. A significant development in the Senate bill was the committee’s support for reattachment of conservation compliance to crop insurance [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p dir="ltr"><a href="http://www.farmbillfacts.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/roundup.jpg"><img class="alignleft  wp-image-1253" style="margin-left: 2px; margin-right: 2px; border-width: 2px; border-color: white; border-style: solid;" alt="Rancher with lasso" src="http://www.farmbillfacts.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/roundup.jpg" width="100" height="96" /></a></p>
<p dir="ltr">House and Senate Agriculture Committees completed work this week on their respective versions of the 2013 Farm Bill. Highlights of both markups are below. Major differences exist between the bills, primarily on nutrition and commodity programs. A significant development in the Senate bill was the committee’s support for <a href="http://www.ag.senate.gov/newsroom/press/release/historic-farm-bill-conservation-pact-adopted-by-senate-agriculture-committee">reattachment of conservation compliance</a> to crop insurance premium assistance, and removal of crop insurance limits from the committee bill. This has been a hard-fought agreement and <a href="https://secure2.convio.net/aft/site/Advocacy?pagename=homepage&amp;page=UserAction&amp;id=413&amp;autologin=true&amp;AddInterest=1061&amp;JServSessionIdr004=styh3oc5j2.app244a">support for conservation compliance is now needed in the Senate</a> to keep those provisions intact.</p>
<p dir="ltr"><a href="http://www.reid.senate.gov/">Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev</a>., has indicated the Senate will take up the Farm Bill beginning on Monday, May 20 so time is of the essence in getting contacts made to Senate offices. A host of amendments are anticipated to place means testing on crop insurance (Durbin-Coburn), cap or even eliminate premium support (Shaheen-Toomey, Flake, Feinstein-McCain), and to publish farmer information on crop insurance assistance. Amendments are also anticipated from <a href="http://www.hoeven.senate.gov/public/">Sen. John Hoeven, R-N.D</a>. to strip conservation compliance and wetland protections from the bill. AFT has worked with partners on the agreement to develop a handy <a href="http://www.farmbillfacts.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Compliance-Agreement-FAQ-v5.pdf">Conservation Compliance FAQ</a> to help answer questions about what the compliance agreement means.</p>
<p dir="ltr">Now to recap the week’s committee activities—</p>
<p><span id="more-1360"></span></p>
<p dir="ltr">After a relatively short mark-up, the <a href="http://www.agriculture.senate.gov/">Senate Agriculture Committee</a> voted 15-5 to move their version of the farm bill out of committee. AFT continues to carefully monitor changes to the Agricultural Conservation Easement Program (ACEP). An amendment from <a href="http://www.bennet.senate.gov/">Senator Michael Bennet, D-Colo</a>., was successful in removing the 40 percent funding floor for the Agricultural Land Easement portion of ACEP, which leaves funding for farmland protection potentially exposed to diversion to wetlands, grasslands and other lands of &#8216;ecological value.&#8217; We are working with committee staff to provide the strongest possible report language to give USDA direction in that regard.</p>
<p dir="ltr">A second notable amendment was from <a href="http://www.leahy.senate.gov/">Sen. Pat Leahy, D-Vt.</a>, which provides a technical fix to the certification program under ALE. As you are aware, the certification process provided in the 2008 Farm Bill has proven to be a challenge based on NRCS interpretation of the program, so the Leahy amendment along with strengthened report language will provide greater clarity and an improved process for states and other qualified entities to become certified.</p>
<p dir="ltr">The <a href="http://agriculture.house.gov/">House Agriculture Committee</a> marked-up their version of the farm bill until late Wednesday evening. Consideration of the conservation title was dispensed with fairly early in the markup with five amendments brought up for consideration. The final committee vote on approving the bill out of committee was 36-10. Differences on nutrition, dairy, sugar and conservation compliance are setting up for a <a href="http://www.dtnprogressivefarmer.com/dtnag/common/link.do?symbolicName=/free/news/template1&amp;paneContentId=5&amp;paneParentId=70104&amp;product=/ag/news/topstories&amp;vendorReference=cdc37f49-a12b-4710-8d92-f41326abfc58">major farm bill floor fight</a> in the House of Representatives as early as mid-June.</p>
<p dir="ltr">An ACEP amendment was offered by <a href="http://seanmaloney.house.gov/">Rep. Sean Patrick Maloney, D-NY</a>, which would have provided USDA discretionary authority to adjust the cash‐cost share requirement for land trusts and state and local governments when acquiring conservation easements by allowing the Secretary to consider a non‐cash (i.e. land) donation from the private landowner to count against the cash‐only donation requirement. The amendment was subsequently withdrawn after disapproval was expressed by committee leadership. AFT has expressed support for the Maloney amendment. ACEP is reduced by $166 million compared to 2012 in the House version.</p>
<p dir="ltr">A pair of Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP) amendments that would have adjusted the wildlife habitat percentage caps to 10 percent or greater than 5 percent respectfully were offered by <a href="http://kuster.house.gov/">Rep. Ann Kuster, D, NH</a>, but were withdrawn after leadership also expressed disapproval of the measures. An EQIP amendment to remove the organic payment limit of $20,000 was also offered and withdrawn. A pair of Conservation Stewardship Program (CSP) amendments by <a href="http://nolan.house.gov/">Rep. Rick Nolan, D-Minn</a>., to increase the acreage cap for to 10.3 million acres nationally, and to focus program eligibility on conservation outcomes were both defeated by voice vote. All were supported by AFT with the exception of the CSP acreage increase, which could have negatively impacted ACEP funding if an offset was required.</p>
<p dir="ltr">No other conservation amendments, such as conservation compliance, were considered by the House Agriculture Committee during mark-up. AFT continues to call for the <a href="http://www.farmbillfacts.org/american-farmland-trust-calls-on-house-of-representatives-to-remedy-two-conservation-issues-in-2013-farm-bill">House to protect conservation programs from further cuts and to include the conservation compliance agreement.</a></p>
<p dir="ltr"><a href="http://www.farmbillfacts.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/roundup.jpg">On the USDA front, Secretary Tom Vilsack announced this week that the Farm Service Agency (FSA) will conduct a four-week </a><a href="http://www.fsa.usda.gov/FSA/newsReleases?area=newsroom&amp;subject=landing&amp;topic=ner&amp;newstype=newsrel&amp;type=detail&amp;item=nr_20130514_rel_0093.html">Conservation Reserve Program</a> (CRP) general sign-up beginning May 20 and ending on June 14. Vilsack also announced the restart of sign-up for continuous CRP, including the Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program, State Acres for Wildlife Enhancement Initiative, the Highly Erodible Land Initiative, the Grassland Restoration Initiative, the Pollinator Habitat Initiative and other related initiatives. Sign-up for continuous CRP began on May 13 and will continue through Sept. 30, 2013.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.farmbillfacts.org/farm-policy-roundup-05-17-2013/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>American Farmland Trust Calls on House of Representatives to Remedy Two Conservation Issues in 2013 Farm Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.farmbillfacts.org/american-farmland-trust-calls-on-house-of-representatives-to-remedy-two-conservation-issues-in-2013-farm-bill?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=american-farmland-trust-calls-on-house-of-representatives-to-remedy-two-conservation-issues-in-2013-farm-bill</link>
		<comments>http://www.farmbillfacts.org/american-farmland-trust-calls-on-house-of-representatives-to-remedy-two-conservation-issues-in-2013-farm-bill#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 18:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>American Farmland Trust</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.farmbillfacts.org/?p=1355</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[American Farmland Trust (AFT) congratulates House Agriculture Committee Chairman Frank Lucas (R-Okla.) and Ranking Member Collin Peterson (D-Minn.) on successfully concluding the Committee’s draft of the 2013 Farm Bill. AFT President Jon Scholl said, “The Committee bill is a critically important step toward the end goal we all share of a five-year farm bill.  I [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.farmbillfacts.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/New-England-farm-in-fogt.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-934" style="border: 2px solid white; margin-left: 2px; margin-right: 2px;" alt="New-England-farm-in-fog(t)" src="http://www.farmbillfacts.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/New-England-farm-in-fogt.jpg" width="175" height="117" /></a>American Farmland Trust (AFT) congratulates House Agriculture Committee Chairman Frank Lucas (R-Okla.) and Ranking Member Collin Peterson (D-Minn.) on successfully concluding the Committee’s draft of the 2013 Farm Bill.</p>
<p>AFT President Jon Scholl said, “The Committee bill is a critically important step toward the end goal we all share of a five-year farm bill.  I congratulate Chairman Lucas and Representative Peterson on their work and leadership in moving the bill through committee.”<br />
<span id="more-1355"></span><br />
On a program level, AFT was disappointed in the Committee’s cuts of $166 million to the new, streamlined Agriculture Conservation Easement (ACE) program.  ACE is built on the principles AFT recommended: keeping working lands in agricultural production, relying on the use of permanent easements and working through partnerships at the local level.</p>
<p>AFT also notes that the House Committee bill fails to re-link crop insurance premium assistance to conservation compliance.  AFT helped lead the coalition of 32 conservation, commodity and farm organizations that proposed the plan to re-link conservation compliance with crop insurance and oppose any further limits on crop insurance as it becomes the primary risk-management tool for America&#8217;s farmers. This is now the consensus position held by the production and conservation sectors.</p>
<p>AFT urges the full House of Representatives to remedy these two issues when the farm bill comes to the House floor in Conference Committee.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.farmbillfacts.org/american-farmland-trust-calls-on-house-of-representatives-to-remedy-two-conservation-issues-in-2013-farm-bill/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Act Now! Tell the Senate to Keep Conservation Compliance in the Farm Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.farmbillfacts.org/tell-senate-keep-compliance-in-farm-bill?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=tell-senate-keep-compliance-in-farm-bill</link>
		<comments>http://www.farmbillfacts.org/tell-senate-keep-compliance-in-farm-bill#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 16:26:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Peters</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Items]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.farmbillfacts.org/?p=1352</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday, a conservation milestone was reached. A historic compromise, bringing together agriculture and conservation groups, passed approval in the Senate Agriculture Committee with bipartisan support as the committee finalized their draft of a new five-year Farm Bill. American Farmland Trust was a leader in brokering the non-partisan conservation compliance agreement included in the draft bill, [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.farmbillfacts.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/iStock_000017478572XSmall.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-1154 alignleft" style="border: 2px solid white; margin-left: 2px; margin-right: 2px;" alt="Farmer and son in front of a tractor" src="http://www.farmbillfacts.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/iStock_000017478572XSmall.jpg" width="130" height="129" /></a>Yesterday, a conservation milestone was reached. A historic compromise, bringing together agriculture and conservation groups, passed approval in the Senate Agriculture Committee with bipartisan support as the committee finalized their draft of a new five-year Farm Bill.</p>
<p>American Farmland Trust was a leader in brokering the non-partisan conservation compliance agreement included in the draft bill, helping bring together 32 major agriculture, crop insurance and conservation groups to provide a stronger safety net for farmers and for the environment.</p>
<p>The Farm Bill will be voted on by the full Senate in just a few days. <a title="Tell the Senate to Support Conservation Compliance" href="https://secure2.convio.net/aft/site/Advocacy?pagename=homepage&amp;page=UserAction&amp;id=413&amp;AddInterest=1061&amp;JServSessionIdr004=864ipdas87.app245a" target="_blank">Please contact your senators today. Ask them to support the conservation compliance agreement in the Farm Bill</a>.<br />
<span id="more-1352"></span><br />
The timing of your message will be critical to gaining support in the full Senate for conservation compliance. The Senate could meet as early as next week to vote on the Farm Bill. The conservation compliance agreement encourages good conservation stewardship, regardless of the size and scale of the farming operation.</p>
<p><a title="Tell the Senate to Support Conservation Compliance" href="https://secure2.convio.net/aft/site/Advocacy?pagename=homepage&amp;page=UserAction&amp;id=413&amp;AddInterest=1061&amp;JServSessionIdr004=864ipdas87.app245a" target="_blank">Act now. Tell your senators that conservation compliance is good for the environment and good for farmers</a>.</p>
<p>Fiscal pressures are a reality of the 2013 Farm Bill discussion, but so are sound conservation programs to ensure long-term economic and environmental benefits in agriculture. <a title="Tell the Senate to Support Conservation Compliance" href="https://secure2.convio.net/aft/site/Advocacy?pagename=homepage&amp;page=UserAction&amp;id=413&amp;AddInterest=1061&amp;JServSessionIdr004=864ipdas87.app245a" target="_blank">Don’t let the gains made in the Senate Agriculture Committee be lost</a>. Funding for programs that keep farmers on the land and protect valuable natural resources must be maintained in this Farm Bill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.farmbillfacts.org/tell-senate-keep-compliance-in-farm-bill/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
